Gold bars were found, concealed into the lining of his suits — really?!
Let everyone know when you find a defense of Menendez in his current legal difficulties by a poster on MOL, or a local Democratic politician, or a NJ Democratic politician, or a national Democratic politician.
As PVW has noted, even if we accept all of Nan's claims about U.S. actions in Ukraine (she has conveniently established that these need not be factual), it still does not justify Putin's War.
To ask it another way: You wouldn’t make each and every one of those concessions, if you had to, in order to save all the lives that have been lost on both sides of the war?
Would you be OK with Russia or China overthrowing our government and installing a puppet? Do you think it we should just be passive and accept that because someone might get hurt? How would you feel if your country was taken over for the benefit of another country?
I remember when people thought Trump was a Russian puppet and they were pretty pissed off.
Absolutely not. If Russia or China attempted a coup using NGOs and their intelligence agencies, I think the only rational defense would be to invade Canada.
They did not have enough men to take Kyiv. It was a diversion. They left as a good will gesture after the peace talks--which then broke down. Of course western media turned it into huge cinematic deal.
It's hard to decide which of Nan's ideas are the most bizarre, but this one is up there.
Not as bizarre as Putin thinking he could take the city of Kyiv with the number of troops he had surrounding the city at the time.
Weren't you the person who suggested we all reference the Institute for the Study of War for "real" information?
Make sure you read the article I posted about their funding and biases. It might just surprise you.
Considering that the attack on Kyiv, if successful, would very likely have given Putin the quick win he wanted, I don't believe for a minute that it was a unserious diversion. Secondly, while I can think of many cases of military operations intended to be diversions from main thrust, I am hard-pressed to think of any that were not expected to succeed.
The most obvious explanation for the failure of the attack on Kiev is that it failed for operational reasons - in other words, the Russians didn't have the skills to pull off a large, fast-moving combined arms operation. And that is not a criticism of Russia, really. Very few armies can manage large operations without a huge amount of practice. The German Army of WW II is really the only army I can think of that managed large scale operations well from the beginning.
Lots of wooded area to traverse in that neighborhood. And I agree the noise from the kids would likely scare the bear away from the recess area. But in the one in a million chance that things could go sideways, I can see why caution is the way to go.
There are insurance companies that do offer the protection. It is less expensive than Amer Water and provides a dollar amount of insurance to repair the sewer line if if becomes damaged.
My experience with Amer Water protection was mediocre at best. It was with my mother's house which I was managing when she was in memory care.
Sewer starts backing up. So I call. They can't get anyone there for a day or so. As I recall (It was 8 or 9 years ago) they hired different plumbers who made three or four visits. After three visits, they called a plumber who had a scope to video the pipeline. He finds the sewer line is broken into two parts and one section dropped an inch or two lower than the other. This means that the wastewater is leaking into the ground and the water table.
The correct cure would be to dig up the road and replace pipe. They didn't want to pay for that. Somehow, they put a "patch" and the sewer line stopped backing up into the house.
For all I know, It may still be leaking into the water table.
--- Then I look at my cousin's experience last year. He had no insurance at all and ended up with a $14k bill.
My takeaway: Find and insurance company that offers this coverage. However, potential for this damage is rare so if you can "self-insure," that is an option.
Popular Comments
ml1
got the QB. It's been a good week :-)
Like 3 Likesnohero
Let everyone know when you find a defense of Menendez in his current legal difficulties by a poster on MOL, or a local Democratic politician, or a NJ Democratic politician, or a national Democratic politician.
Like 3 Likesml1
got the QB with the hints today. Did not need the Buddy however.
Like 3 Likestjohn
As PVW has noted, even if we accept all of Nan's claims about U.S. actions in Ukraine (she has conveniently established that these need not be factual), it still does not justify Putin's War.
Like 3 Likestjohn
Absolutely not. If Russia or China attempted a coup using NGOs and their intelligence agencies, I think the only rational defense would be to invade Canada.
Like 3 Likestjohn
Jamie,
Can I make this my signature line for every post I make?
Like 2 Likestjohn
Considering that the attack on Kyiv, if successful, would very likely have given Putin the quick win he wanted, I don't believe for a minute that it was a unserious diversion. Secondly, while I can think of many cases of military operations intended to be diversions from main thrust, I am hard-pressed to think of any that were not expected to succeed.
The most obvious explanation for the failure of the attack on Kiev is that it failed for operational reasons - in other words, the Russians didn't have the skills to pull off a large, fast-moving combined arms operation. And that is not a criticism of Russia, really. Very few armies can manage large operations without a huge amount of practice. The German Army of WW II is really the only army I can think of that managed large scale operations well from the beginning.
Like 2 Likesdrummerboy
there's just too much of his antics. we can't mention everything.
Like 2 Likesmrincredible
Here’s a pic from the Glenside Rd sighting.
Lots of wooded area to traverse in that neighborhood. And I agree the noise from the kids would likely scare the bear away from the recess area. But in the one in a million chance that things could go sideways, I can see why caution is the way to go.
Formerlyjerseyjack
There are insurance companies that do offer the protection. It is less expensive than Amer Water and provides a dollar amount of insurance to repair the sewer line if if becomes damaged.
My experience with Amer Water protection was mediocre at best. It was with my mother's house which I was managing when she was in memory care.
Sewer starts backing up. So I call. They can't get anyone there for a day or so. As I recall (It was 8 or 9 years ago) they hired different plumbers who made three or four visits. After three visits, they called a plumber who had a scope to video the pipeline. He finds the sewer line is broken into two parts and one section dropped an inch or two lower than the other. This means that the wastewater is leaking into the ground and the water table.
The correct cure would be to dig up the road and replace pipe. They didn't want to pay for that. Somehow, they put a "patch" and the sewer line stopped backing up into the house.
For all I know, It may still be leaking into the water table.
--- Then I look at my cousin's experience last year. He had no insurance at all and ended up with a $14k bill.
My takeaway: Find and insurance company that offers this coverage. However, potential for this damage is rare so if you can "self-insure," that is an option.
Like 2 Likes