mtierney said:
Or, why did the president not point to his Rose Garden remarks weeks ago?
Jackie_Treehorn2 said:
it's revisionist history, a/k/a a blatant lie. Everyone with a brain knows they touted this phony you tube video, which may gullible saps ran with, trotted out multiple surrogates on multiple shows, and even Obama himself referenced it still again when speaking to the U.N.
Everyone smirking today will be drowning their sorrows on Election night.
mtierney said:
The day after Benghazi, the words "acts of terror" most likely referred to the numerous outbreaks in several countries over the video.
mtierney said:
The day after Benghazi, the words "acts of terror" most likely referred to the numerous outbreaks in several countries over the video.
jerseyjack said:
This post sucks... what's the matter with you righties? The talking point memo sent out today is to focus on Candy, not the use of the word terror.
mtierney said:
Now we have a failed terror plot in NYC today!
When you're done standing on your head, maybe you can explain this. You seem to be saying that Obama incorrectly referred to the video-related demonstrations in Cairo etc. as terrorist attacks; and also incorrectly referred to the terrorist attack in Libya as video-related.mtierney said:
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.
The day after Benghazi, the words "acts of terror" most likely referred to the numerous outbreaks in several countries over the video.
Tom_Reingold said:
mtierney said:
Now we have a failed terror plot in NYC today!
Yeah, and?
dave said:
Why do you think did he held that press conference?
johnlockedema said:
Face it, he spoke about terror attacks in the Rose Garden speech in general terms, not about Benghazi.
ProgressivePatriot said:
johnlockedema said:
Face it, he spoke about terror attacks in the Rose Garden speech in general terms, not about Benghazi.
And in the post-game interview the other night, Jim Leyland was just talking about pitching performances in general and it had nothing to do with the game that night.
author said:
I sincerely hope Willard continues to make this point a major part of his campaign. A race which is now close will become a text
book lesson in how not to run a campaign. In what comic book store did he find his advisers?
johnlockedema said:
author said:
I sincerely hope Willard continues to make this point a major part of his campaign. A race which is now close will become a text
book lesson in how not to run a campaign. In what comic book store did he find his advisers?
Right. A bigger issue for Barack Hussein Obama is Big Bird and binders than the security of our State Department employees.
johnlockedema said:
Right. A bigger issue for Barack Hussein Obama is Big Bird and binders than the security of our State Department employees.
Renovated apartment in Bloomfield
3 Bd | 2Full Ba
$2,850
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
The video story was discredited hours after the killings and subsequently by those investigating it in DC.
Thinking about it today, I have come to the conclusion that it must have been a very misguided attempt by the Obama campaign to downplay the event so close to Election Day.
Or, why did the president not point to his Rose Garden remarks weeks ago?